Share this post on:

Rces, P.S.; data curation, A.S. and P.S.; writing–original draft preparation, A.S. and O.D.P.; writing–review and editing, A.S., O.D.P. and P.S.; visualization, A.S., B.L., O.D.P. and P.S.; supervision, A.S. and P.S.; project administration P.S.; funding acquisition P.S. All authors have read and agreed for the published version of your manuscript. Funding: This analysis was funded by the Rural Development Programme from the Apulia Region (Italy) 2014–2020, Submeasure 16.2 (Support for pilot projects plus the development of new goods, practices, processes and technologies, as well as the transfer and the dissemination of the outcomes obtained by the Operational Groups), in the framework from the SOILLESS GO project, project code (CUP) B97H20000990009. Paper n. 12. Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable. Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved within the study. Data Availability Statement: The raw information supporting the conclusions of this short article will likely be made offered by the authors, with out undue reservation. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
buildingsArticleMass Timber Envelopes in Passivhaus Buildings: Designing for Moisture Safety in Hot and Humid Australian ClimatesMarcus Strang 1, , Paola Leardini 1 , Arianna Brambilla 2 and Eugenia Gasparri1School of Architecture, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia; [email protected] College of Architecture, Design and Preparing (CoCoA Lab), The University of Sydney, Melagatran Formula Sydney 2006, Australia; [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (E.G.) Correspondence: [email protected]: Strang, M.; Leardini, P.; Brambilla, A.; Gasparri, E. Mass Timber Envelopes in Passivhaus Buildings: Designing for Moisture Safety in Hot and Humid Australian Climates. Buildings 2021, 11, 478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ buildings11100478 Academic Editor: Sergej Medved Received: 21 August 2021 Accepted: 5 October 2021 Published: 14 OctoberAbstract: The uptake of buildings employing cross-laminated timber (CLT) assemblies and created to Passivhaus common has accelerated internationally more than the previous two decades as a consequence of numerous things such as responses towards the climate crisis by decarbonising the developing stock. Structural CLT technology and the Passivhaus certification both show measurable rewards in minimizing power consumption, when contributing to durability and indoor comfort. Having said that, there’s a general lack of evidence to assistance a rapid uptake of those technologies in Australia. This paper responds for the compelling want of providing quantitative information and adoption tactics; it explores their combined application as a possible pathway for climate-appropriate design and style of energy-efficient and durable mass timber envelope solutions for subtropical and tropical Australian climates. Hygrothermal risk assessments of interstitial condensation and mould development of CLT wall assemblies inform best-practice style of mass timber buildings in hot and humid climates. This analysis identified that the durability of mass timber buildings situated in hot and humid climates might benefit from implementing the Passivhaus regular to handle interior circumstances. The findings also suggested that climate-specific style on the wall assembly is vital for mass timber buildings, in conjunction with outstanding stormwater management practices through construction and corrosion protection for metallic fasteners. Keywords:.

Share this post on:

Author: M2 ion channel