Ve cranial appendages (two paired postorbital ones, and an unpaired appendage

Ve cranial appendages (two paired postorbital ones, and an unpaired appendage projecting between the eyes on the caudal part of the nasals) and large, flaring sabre-like upper canines. (B) Example of the highly endemized association of Gargano, with a reconstructed life appearance of the giant hedgehog Deinogalerix (in scale with modern Erinaceus europaeus). Artwork by Mauricio Ant .A BM DM-3189 custom synthesis species Hoplitomeryx sp. 1 Hoplitomeryx sp. 2 Hoplitomeryx sp. 3 Hoplitomeryx sp. 4 Zone 2, 3, 4 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 1, 2, 4 1, 2, 4, 5 N 7 34 7 15 kg 10.5 20.7 30.1 48.2 N 2 13 3 5 HYP HI 0.813 0.832 0.703 0.701 N 9 48 12 18 pS 80 91.02 100 86.2 A-836339 supplier Mesowear pR 20 8.98 0 17.8 pB 0 0 0 0 pH 100 97.7 100 100 pL 0 2.3 0 0 MS 0.2 0.153 0 0.137 1st PG B B B BB Discriminant Analysis p 0.945 0.674 0.373 0.903 D2 0.114 0.789 1.971 0.205 2nd PG MF MF MF MF D2 5.752 8.691 12.021 6.Table 1. (A) Chronological record of the Hoplitomeryx species, and summary of body mass, hypsodonty and dental mesowear, and (B) results of the discriminant analysis (and predicted group) according to the mesowear features. Abbreviations: body mass (BM); number of specimens measured (N); kilograms (kg); hypsodonty (HYP); hypsodonty index (HI); percentage of specimens with sharp (pS), rounded (pR) and blunt (pB) cusps; percentage of specimens with high (pH) and low (pL) occlusal relief; mesowear score (MS); predicted group (PG); Squared Mahalanobis distance (D2); browsers (B); and mixed feeders (MF). See Table S2 and S3 for further details on the discriminant analysis.Long-term patterns of tooth wear. All the species of Hoplitomeryx show occlusal enamel surfaces with a predominance of sharp cusps and high oclussal relief, while there is a considerable variation in the proportion of rounded cusps depending on the species. Hoplitomeryx sp. 1 and Hoplitomeryx sp. 4 have more rounded apices than the remaining species. Fossil taxa do not show any incidence of blunt cusps or, with the exception of Hoplitomeryx sp. 2 (represented by the largest sample), low relief (Table 1A). All these facts presumably exclude a high abundance of abrasives in the diets31, such as phytolith-rich grasses and exogenous dust and grit. The scores recorded cover a narrow range of levels in food abrasiveness, ranging from 0 in Hoplitomeryx sp. 3 (similar to Alces alces and Rhinoceros sondiacus; scores converted from data of Fortelius and Solounias31), 0.1 in Hoplitomeryx sp. 2 and Hoplitomeryx sp. 4 (Odocoileus virginianus and Okapia johnstoni), to 0.2 in Hoplitomeryx sp. 1 (Dicerorhinus sumatraensis). This also indicates low levels of abrasion, as typical of leaf browsers, and points to a somewhat larger amount of abrasive material in Hoplitomeryx sp. 2 than in the remaining species. MesowearScientific RepoRts | 6:29803 | DOI: 10.1038/srepwww.nature.com/scientificreports/signals reveal, therefore, attrition dominated wear surfaces and low levels of dietary abrasion, compatible with the signal characteristic of extant browsing mammals31. In addition, results are not compatible with the inclusion of external abrasives (dust, grit or soil) being habitually incorporated into the diet by Hoplitomeryx species in the natural environments of Gargano. Four body size classes are present in Hoplitomeryx, for which mass ranges from approximately 10 kg in Hoplitomeryx sp. 1 (similar to the largest species of Deinogalerix from Gargano6) to 50 kg in Hoplitomeryx sp. 4. Hoplitomeryx sp. 2 and Hoplitomeryx sp. 3 are intermediate-sized spec.Ve cranial appendages (two paired postorbital ones, and an unpaired appendage projecting between the eyes on the caudal part of the nasals) and large, flaring sabre-like upper canines. (B) Example of the highly endemized association of Gargano, with a reconstructed life appearance of the giant hedgehog Deinogalerix (in scale with modern Erinaceus europaeus). Artwork by Mauricio Ant .A BM Species Hoplitomeryx sp. 1 Hoplitomeryx sp. 2 Hoplitomeryx sp. 3 Hoplitomeryx sp. 4 Zone 2, 3, 4 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 1, 2, 4 1, 2, 4, 5 N 7 34 7 15 kg 10.5 20.7 30.1 48.2 N 2 13 3 5 HYP HI 0.813 0.832 0.703 0.701 N 9 48 12 18 pS 80 91.02 100 86.2 Mesowear pR 20 8.98 0 17.8 pB 0 0 0 0 pH 100 97.7 100 100 pL 0 2.3 0 0 MS 0.2 0.153 0 0.137 1st PG B B B BB Discriminant Analysis p 0.945 0.674 0.373 0.903 D2 0.114 0.789 1.971 0.205 2nd PG MF MF MF MF D2 5.752 8.691 12.021 6.Table 1. (A) Chronological record of the Hoplitomeryx species, and summary of body mass, hypsodonty and dental mesowear, and (B) results of the discriminant analysis (and predicted group) according to the mesowear features. Abbreviations: body mass (BM); number of specimens measured (N); kilograms (kg); hypsodonty (HYP); hypsodonty index (HI); percentage of specimens with sharp (pS), rounded (pR) and blunt (pB) cusps; percentage of specimens with high (pH) and low (pL) occlusal relief; mesowear score (MS); predicted group (PG); Squared Mahalanobis distance (D2); browsers (B); and mixed feeders (MF). See Table S2 and S3 for further details on the discriminant analysis.Long-term patterns of tooth wear. All the species of Hoplitomeryx show occlusal enamel surfaces with a predominance of sharp cusps and high oclussal relief, while there is a considerable variation in the proportion of rounded cusps depending on the species. Hoplitomeryx sp. 1 and Hoplitomeryx sp. 4 have more rounded apices than the remaining species. Fossil taxa do not show any incidence of blunt cusps or, with the exception of Hoplitomeryx sp. 2 (represented by the largest sample), low relief (Table 1A). All these facts presumably exclude a high abundance of abrasives in the diets31, such as phytolith-rich grasses and exogenous dust and grit. The scores recorded cover a narrow range of levels in food abrasiveness, ranging from 0 in Hoplitomeryx sp. 3 (similar to Alces alces and Rhinoceros sondiacus; scores converted from data of Fortelius and Solounias31), 0.1 in Hoplitomeryx sp. 2 and Hoplitomeryx sp. 4 (Odocoileus virginianus and Okapia johnstoni), to 0.2 in Hoplitomeryx sp. 1 (Dicerorhinus sumatraensis). This also indicates low levels of abrasion, as typical of leaf browsers, and points to a somewhat larger amount of abrasive material in Hoplitomeryx sp. 2 than in the remaining species. MesowearScientific RepoRts | 6:29803 | DOI: 10.1038/srepwww.nature.com/scientificreports/signals reveal, therefore, attrition dominated wear surfaces and low levels of dietary abrasion, compatible with the signal characteristic of extant browsing mammals31. In addition, results are not compatible with the inclusion of external abrasives (dust, grit or soil) being habitually incorporated into the diet by Hoplitomeryx species in the natural environments of Gargano. Four body size classes are present in Hoplitomeryx, for which mass ranges from approximately 10 kg in Hoplitomeryx sp. 1 (similar to the largest species of Deinogalerix from Gargano6) to 50 kg in Hoplitomeryx sp. 4. Hoplitomeryx sp. 2 and Hoplitomeryx sp. 3 are intermediate-sized spec.