R thematic categories, this matrix consists of vectors of 0s and

R thematic categories, this matrix consists of vectors of 0s and 1s, representing “not mentioned,” and “mentioned,” respectively. However, after frequency-of-mention scale coding (or intensity scale coding), this matrix consists of discrete numerical values that represent the scale code values of 0, 1, 2, or 3, for the number of mentions contributed by each case and as listed AZD-8835 biological activity within a given thematic category. Intensity scale coding–In contrast, for these same narrative statements from case ID133, under intensity scale coding we can code the second statement, “runs his house like a king, or worse like a slave driver,” as 3 = emphatic mention, because of the adjective “worse” and the addition of “slave driver,” which are regarded as more cruel than just being “a ruler or king.”9 Finally, the first and third statements, “He rules, his home as his castle” and “Wife and kids are there to serve him,” are instances of 2 = a solid mention, as these depict a medium level of emphasis. As contrasted with frequency scale coding, for intensity scale coding we have three scale code values for case ID133. However, given the convention that, “the case is the unit of analysis,” each case should contribute only one scale code value to a given thematic category, so what to do? Under intensity scale coding, we have established the heuristic rule that “regardless of the number of codes that emerge, assign the RR6 web highest intensity-level code from among all values” and that value will constitute the optimal intensity scale code value that is contributed by a particular case. In this case, with observed scale code levels of 3, 2, and 2; clearly the single scale code value contributed by case ID133 for the “physically controlling and abusive” thematic category would be a “3.”NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript8Atlas.ti allows a printout of all response codes listed within each family, and we have tagged each of these with the case ID number to aid in integrating data analyses. 9In addition to assessed levels of emphasis, given that we audio record these Platica focus question interviews, as needed, we can listen to a specific section of the interview and more closely ascertain the levels of the respondent’s affect and emotional emphasis. 10A research investigator may choose to establish a different convention or decision rule if a review of the response codes presents several responses where truncating these according to a, “highest code rule,” introduces distortions that compete with the principal aim of “allowing the data to speak for itself.” However, within a study once a decision rule is established, all cases should be assessed and coded according to that decision rule.J Mix Methods Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 December 11.Castro et al.PageCreating exemplar anchor codes–In preparation for conducting intensity scale coding, we have found that for a given thematic category it is necessary to examine the response codes generated for all cases and then to identify a set of exemplar anchor codes that best describe each of the three levels of intensity scale coding. Within a given thematic category, these exemplar anchor codes provide category-specific benchmarks to help the coders rate the response codes across all cases. For example, for the “physically controlling and abusive” family, one would identify the following exemplar anchor codes to define the three levels of intensity scale coding: (3) = “He is.R thematic categories, this matrix consists of vectors of 0s and 1s, representing “not mentioned,” and “mentioned,” respectively. However, after frequency-of-mention scale coding (or intensity scale coding), this matrix consists of discrete numerical values that represent the scale code values of 0, 1, 2, or 3, for the number of mentions contributed by each case and as listed within a given thematic category. Intensity scale coding–In contrast, for these same narrative statements from case ID133, under intensity scale coding we can code the second statement, “runs his house like a king, or worse like a slave driver,” as 3 = emphatic mention, because of the adjective “worse” and the addition of “slave driver,” which are regarded as more cruel than just being “a ruler or king.”9 Finally, the first and third statements, “He rules, his home as his castle” and “Wife and kids are there to serve him,” are instances of 2 = a solid mention, as these depict a medium level of emphasis. As contrasted with frequency scale coding, for intensity scale coding we have three scale code values for case ID133. However, given the convention that, “the case is the unit of analysis,” each case should contribute only one scale code value to a given thematic category, so what to do? Under intensity scale coding, we have established the heuristic rule that “regardless of the number of codes that emerge, assign the highest intensity-level code from among all values” and that value will constitute the optimal intensity scale code value that is contributed by a particular case. In this case, with observed scale code levels of 3, 2, and 2; clearly the single scale code value contributed by case ID133 for the “physically controlling and abusive” thematic category would be a “3.”NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript8Atlas.ti allows a printout of all response codes listed within each family, and we have tagged each of these with the case ID number to aid in integrating data analyses. 9In addition to assessed levels of emphasis, given that we audio record these Platica focus question interviews, as needed, we can listen to a specific section of the interview and more closely ascertain the levels of the respondent’s affect and emotional emphasis. 10A research investigator may choose to establish a different convention or decision rule if a review of the response codes presents several responses where truncating these according to a, “highest code rule,” introduces distortions that compete with the principal aim of “allowing the data to speak for itself.” However, within a study once a decision rule is established, all cases should be assessed and coded according to that decision rule.J Mix Methods Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 December 11.Castro et al.PageCreating exemplar anchor codes–In preparation for conducting intensity scale coding, we have found that for a given thematic category it is necessary to examine the response codes generated for all cases and then to identify a set of exemplar anchor codes that best describe each of the three levels of intensity scale coding. Within a given thematic category, these exemplar anchor codes provide category-specific benchmarks to help the coders rate the response codes across all cases. For example, for the “physically controlling and abusive” family, one would identify the following exemplar anchor codes to define the three levels of intensity scale coding: (3) = “He is.