Share this post on:

en times so that predictions for all samples are obtained. For the elastic net, MTLASSO, MIC, bootstrapped samplings are used to train models as the procedure used for CHER. Because both the elastic net and MTLASSO require tuning of parameters, we optimize the parameters of these models through a nested cross-validation procedure: the parameters are selected within each “fold” using a nested ten-fold cross-validation optimizing mean square errors. To include only features that are frequently chosen in bootstrapping runs for elastic net, we apply different Aphrodine cost thresholds to jk. We use jk ! 0.5 for final elastic net models since it retains robust features without being too conservative or too lenient. The same threshold was used MTLASSO. For MIC, because of its similarity to CHER, we use the same threshold jk ! 0.3 to choose features that are frequently selected among bootstrapping runs. In addition, we apply BMKL to the same datasets and features. Three kernels are used for mutation, copy number and gene expression, respectively. Similar to the elastic net and MTLASSO, the parameters of BMKL are tuned through nested cross-validation procedure. Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients between the predictions and the phenotype data are calculated as evaluation metrics. When an algorithm fails to select any feature for a phenotype, the average of training data is used as prediction. Comparison of Features Selected by CHER and Elastic-net To compare the features chosen by CHER and elastic net, we apply the algorithms to all samples in each data set. Bootstrapping is used to select robust predictors as described above. CCLE-BreastOvary is excluded from the comparison because elastic net fails PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19753652 to select any robust predictors. After the features are selected, we compare the overlaps between the two algorithms. In addition, adjusted R2 is used to evaluate the variance explained by the selected features. ~~ Endocrine hormones secreted by pancreatic islets maintain glucose homeostasis throughout life. During rodent development, islets arise from progenitor cells expressing the transcription factor neurogenin 3, which is necessary and sufficient for endocrine specification and is similarly expressed during human pancreas development. The role of NGN3 in the adult pancreas is unclear. NGN3 cannot be routinely detected in the rodent pancreas but knockout has a negative impact on adult islet function. Upregulation by dedifferentiating beta cells suggests NGN3 may mark loss of mature function or represent a less committed progenitor cell state. Although the cell lineage, timing and mechanisms of islet development have been established, the processes maintaining islet mass throughout life remain in question. Estimates of human beta cell longevity suggest islet formation is completed early in life and that beta cells persist with limited proliferation compared to rodents. Murine lineage-tracing studies suggest that preexisting beta cells, not exocrine cells, are the predominant source of regenerating beta cells under normal circumstances and following certain types of experimental pancreatic injury. However, other cells within PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19752526 islets and exocrine cells are capable of generating insulin expressing cells and islet-like structures following injury or in vitro manipulation. A role for NGN3 in the formation of islets in the adult pancreas is also difficult to establish. NGN3 expression following injury is insufficient to drive transdifferentiation of duct ce

Share this post on:

Author: M2 ion channel