Ong those sufferers with poor socioeconomic status, age at diagnosis will be larger and these

Ong those sufferers with poor socioeconomic status, age at diagnosis will be larger and these patients with great socioeconomic status had reduced age at diagnosis.This association hasn’t observed in Various Logistic Regression.Furthermore, in Univariate Multinomial Logistic Regression model the relationship amongst household socioeconomic status and number of pregnancies was considerable (p value).This association has indicated in various models, also.It has meant that by improving the socioeconomic status, number of pregnancies have decreased.Depending on the results of this study, in Univariate Multinomial Logistic Regression Model, there was a considerable relationship between familyVol , No , JanuaryFebruarysocioeconomic status and duration of breast feeding (p value).It has meant that by enhancing family socioeconomic status, PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21591972 the duration of breast feeding has decreased.This association wasn’t GS-4997 Autophagy significant in Several Logistic Regression Model.Akbari et al.has discovered that breast feeding was a protective element in against of breast cancer and by breast feeding duration growing; the possibility of breast cancer would be decreased.Two years breast feeding had the most protective impact against breast cancer.Pregnancy and delivering up to three instances could minimize the opportunity of breast cancer .Within this study, while there wasn’t any substantial partnership in between family socioeconomic status and quantity of abortions in Univariate Logistic Regression Model, Various Logistic Regression model has indicated that fantastic socioeconomic status and quantity of abortions have related to each other significantly (p value).A systematic overview on studies among the Middle East ladies in regards to the part of abortion for breast cancer incidence has stated that in studies abortion was a danger factorMohaghegh et al.for breast cancer, in studies it wasn’t relevant and inside the final study, it was a preventive element .This study has indicated that there was no significant partnership amongst family socioeconomic status and smoking.But, the associations involving moderate and superior socioeconomic status and smoking had been substantial in Various Logistic Regression Model (p worth.and p worth respectively).It has meant that amongst those patients with moderate and good socioeconomic status, the odds of becoming smoker have been decrease in comparison with these sufferers with poor socioeconomic status.In this study, there wasn’t any substantial partnership between family members socioeconomic status and fatty diet program.A metaanalysis by Nojumi et al.about breast cancer threat components involving the Middle East females has indicated that smoking and having BMI a lot more than would be breast cancer risk variables.AcknowledgementThis analysis has funded by a grant from the Cancer Analysis Center of Shahid Beheshti University of Medial Sciences.We’ve got appreciated the Cancer Research Center of Shahid Beheshti University of Medial Sciences, for giving information for our study.Authors have thanked all the cooperators of Cancer Study Center of Shahid Beheshti University of Medial Sciences particularly Dr.Maryam Khayamzadeh.We’ve got also extented our thanks to all the sufferers and their relatives for their kind cooperation together with the researchers.Conflict of InterestThe authors have no conflict of interest in this report.Authors’ ContributionAll authors participated in study design, information evaluation, interpretation and manuscript writing.ConclusionThe final results of this study have shown that among these patients with improved socioeconomi.