Ssifier for human respiratory viral infection at the time of maximal

Ssifier for human respiratory viral infection at the time of maximal symptoms using data from three human viral challenge cohorts (rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and H3N2 influenza A) [4]. Sparse latent factor analysis of peripheral blood mRNA expression data revealed a pattern of geneexpression common across symptomatic individuals from all viral challenges [4]. Furthermore, an analysis of publically available peripheral blood-based gene expression data indicated that the respiratory viral signature could distinguish patients with symptomatic viral infections from those with bacterial infections as well as from healthy controls [4,5]. The emergence of pandemic H1N1 influenza in 2009 highlights the need for new approaches to diagnosis of respiratory tract infections. A diagnostic test that could identify patients before the onset of symptoms (but after exposure) who will later become ill would be an indispensible tool for guiding individual treatment decisions when antiviral supplies may be limited. Furthermore,Host Genomic Signatures Detect H1N1 Infectionthese early results may forecast epidemic/pandemic spread, potentially mitigating pandemic intensity [6]. Although previous studies with dengue, melioidosis, tuberculosis, candidiasis, and sepsis have focused on diagnosis in patients as they present with active disease [7,8,9,10,11,12], we utilized human influenza challenge cohorts with a defined inoculation event coupled with dense serial sampling to explore the ability of modern genomic and statistical techniques to accurately classify individuals with multiple Gracillin web subtypes of influenza infection as early as possible following viral exposure. Through this method, we have demonstrated the potential for a robust host gene response signature in pre-symptomatic human infection and suggest the utility of this approach for detecting pandemic H1N1 infection in an acute care setting.Results Healthy Volunteers Demonstrate Variable Clinical Responses to Inoculation with Seasonal Influenza H1N1 and H3NFor the H1N1 challenge we inoculated 24 volunteers age 20?5 with influenza A (A/Brisbane/59/2007). Nine (38 ) of the 24 inoculated subjects developed symptoms consistent with viral upper respiratory infection with confirmed shedding of challenge virus (Fig. 1). This infection rate is similar to previous viral challenge studies [13], and occurs despite similar patient profiles, vaccination history, and baseline influenza GSK -3203591 hemagglutination and neutralization titers (Sup Tables s1 and s2). Subjects exhibited variability of time to initiation of symptoms as well as maximal severity of symptoms achieved (Fig. s1), but symptom onset began an average of 61.3 hours after inoculation (range 24?08 hrs, median 72 hrs). Subjects who became ill experienced maximal symptoms on average 102.7 hours after inoculation (range 60?20 hours, median 108 hrs). For symptomatic subjects, the average total 5 day symptom score was 19.7 (range 6?4) with an average daily peak of 7.4 (range 4?3, Table s3). For the H3N2 challenge (A/Wisconsin/67/2005) reported previously [4,14], we inoculated 17 volunteers (mean age 27 years; range 22?1 years). For the 9 (53 ) symptomatic-infected subjects, symptom onset began earlier than in the H1N1 challenge(Fig. 1) at an average of 49.3 hours after inoculation (range 24?4 hours, median 48 hrs). Subjects who became ill experienced maximal symptoms 12926553 on average 90.6 hours after inoculation (range 60 to 108 hours, median 96 hours). For these.Ssifier for human respiratory viral infection at the time of maximal symptoms using data from three human viral challenge cohorts (rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and H3N2 influenza A) [4]. Sparse latent factor analysis of peripheral blood mRNA expression data revealed a pattern of geneexpression common across symptomatic individuals from all viral challenges [4]. Furthermore, an analysis of publically available peripheral blood-based gene expression data indicated that the respiratory viral signature could distinguish patients with symptomatic viral infections from those with bacterial infections as well as from healthy controls [4,5]. The emergence of pandemic H1N1 influenza in 2009 highlights the need for new approaches to diagnosis of respiratory tract infections. A diagnostic test that could identify patients before the onset of symptoms (but after exposure) who will later become ill would be an indispensible tool for guiding individual treatment decisions when antiviral supplies may be limited. Furthermore,Host Genomic Signatures Detect H1N1 Infectionthese early results may forecast epidemic/pandemic spread, potentially mitigating pandemic intensity [6]. Although previous studies with dengue, melioidosis, tuberculosis, candidiasis, and sepsis have focused on diagnosis in patients as they present with active disease [7,8,9,10,11,12], we utilized human influenza challenge cohorts with a defined inoculation event coupled with dense serial sampling to explore the ability of modern genomic and statistical techniques to accurately classify individuals with multiple subtypes of influenza infection as early as possible following viral exposure. Through this method, we have demonstrated the potential for a robust host gene response signature in pre-symptomatic human infection and suggest the utility of this approach for detecting pandemic H1N1 infection in an acute care setting.Results Healthy Volunteers Demonstrate Variable Clinical Responses to Inoculation with Seasonal Influenza H1N1 and H3NFor the H1N1 challenge we inoculated 24 volunteers age 20?5 with influenza A (A/Brisbane/59/2007). Nine (38 ) of the 24 inoculated subjects developed symptoms consistent with viral upper respiratory infection with confirmed shedding of challenge virus (Fig. 1). This infection rate is similar to previous viral challenge studies [13], and occurs despite similar patient profiles, vaccination history, and baseline influenza hemagglutination and neutralization titers (Sup Tables s1 and s2). Subjects exhibited variability of time to initiation of symptoms as well as maximal severity of symptoms achieved (Fig. s1), but symptom onset began an average of 61.3 hours after inoculation (range 24?08 hrs, median 72 hrs). Subjects who became ill experienced maximal symptoms on average 102.7 hours after inoculation (range 60?20 hours, median 108 hrs). For symptomatic subjects, the average total 5 day symptom score was 19.7 (range 6?4) with an average daily peak of 7.4 (range 4?3, Table s3). For the H3N2 challenge (A/Wisconsin/67/2005) reported previously [4,14], we inoculated 17 volunteers (mean age 27 years; range 22?1 years). For the 9 (53 ) symptomatic-infected subjects, symptom onset began earlier than in the H1N1 challenge(Fig. 1) at an average of 49.3 hours after inoculation (range 24?4 hours, median 48 hrs). Subjects who became ill experienced maximal symptoms 12926553 on average 90.6 hours after inoculation (range 60 to 108 hours, median 96 hours). For these.