Reater than 0.5, and six normal modes showing this level of cooperativity.

Reater than 0.5, and six normal modes showing this level of cooperativity. The weakercooperativity in the principal modes is due to the weakened symmetry under thermal fluctuations in the MD simulations. The differences in the mode structures should affect the amplitude of the fluctuations of the 115103-85-0 manufacturer subunits in the two TRAPs. To examine this, the RMS intra-subunit fluctuations of the Ca ??=2 atoms, SDr2 T (Dri is the displacement of the Ca atom i from i the average position), are plotted by residue in Figure 8. In this calculation, we removed the rotation and translation of a subunit by superimposing each subunit onto its average structure. As suggested by the structures of the first principal modes in Figure 6, these internal fluctuations are larger in the 11-mer TRAP than in the 12-mer. The largest differences are seen in the BC loop (residues 25?2) and the DE loop (residues 47?2). The large fluctuations in the loop regions of the 11-mer were also observed by NMR measurement [30] and a previous simulation study [31]. It was found from the MD snapshots of the 11-mer that the bound tryptophan ligand was not tightly held by its hydrogen bonds to residues on these loops. Such large loop motions were not observed in the 12-mer where the ligand molecules appeared to be firmly bound throughout the simulation. It is intriguing to find two crystal structures which are so similar, yet whose dynamics are so different. Considering the mismatch between the number of the subunits and the number of wave nodes in 1662274 the 11-mer, it suggests that the fluctuations of the loops are coupled with the deformations around the wave nodes located at the subunit cores. Figure 9 shows the covariance matrix for the z-components of the mass centers of the subunits,SDciz Dcjz T, which contribute theInfluence of Symmetry on Protein DynamicsFigure 7. Correlations of the principal modes. Correlation function Ck a?of the displacements of two atoms separated by an angle Da calculated for the principal modes of (A) 11-mer TRAP and (B) 12-mer TRAP. The vertical broken lines indicate the location of the subunit ML-281 chemical information interfaces. The plots are for the principal modes of the 1st (red), 2nd (green), 3rd (blue), 4th (yellow), 5th (cyan), 6th (magenta), and 7th (black) from top to bottom. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050011.gmost to the global deformations of the ring. The variances of the 12-mer (the diagonal part of Figure 9B) are larger than those of the 11-mer (Figure 9A). 1516647 In both matrices, one can see positive or negative correlation between every fourth subunit, i, i+3, i+6, and i+9. The correlation between i and i+3 is negative, and between i and i+6 is positive. This pattern is characteristic in the T’ modes. 3 In fact, essentially the same pattern was obtained using only the lowest-frequency normal modes of T’ . This pattern is clearer for 3 the 12-mer than for the 11-mer since the number of subunits moving cooperatively (three) is commensurable with 12, but notwith 11. Movements of the entire subunit in the xy-plane showed only a small difference between the two TRAPs, and their correlation pattern was found to originate from the minor T’ 2 mode, not from the T’ (data not shown). 3 The above observations on the fluctuations were further confirmed by the decomposition of the sum of the fluctuations P SDr2 T, into the of the Ca atoms within a single subunit, ii[subunitinternal and the external (i.e., translational and rotational) contributions. The internal contribution was calculate.Reater than 0.5, and six normal modes showing this level of cooperativity. The weakercooperativity in the principal modes is due to the weakened symmetry under thermal fluctuations in the MD simulations. The differences in the mode structures should affect the amplitude of the fluctuations of the subunits in the two TRAPs. To examine this, the RMS intra-subunit fluctuations of the Ca ??=2 atoms, SDr2 T (Dri is the displacement of the Ca atom i from i the average position), are plotted by residue in Figure 8. In this calculation, we removed the rotation and translation of a subunit by superimposing each subunit onto its average structure. As suggested by the structures of the first principal modes in Figure 6, these internal fluctuations are larger in the 11-mer TRAP than in the 12-mer. The largest differences are seen in the BC loop (residues 25?2) and the DE loop (residues 47?2). The large fluctuations in the loop regions of the 11-mer were also observed by NMR measurement [30] and a previous simulation study [31]. It was found from the MD snapshots of the 11-mer that the bound tryptophan ligand was not tightly held by its hydrogen bonds to residues on these loops. Such large loop motions were not observed in the 12-mer where the ligand molecules appeared to be firmly bound throughout the simulation. It is intriguing to find two crystal structures which are so similar, yet whose dynamics are so different. Considering the mismatch between the number of the subunits and the number of wave nodes in 1662274 the 11-mer, it suggests that the fluctuations of the loops are coupled with the deformations around the wave nodes located at the subunit cores. Figure 9 shows the covariance matrix for the z-components of the mass centers of the subunits,SDciz Dcjz T, which contribute theInfluence of Symmetry on Protein DynamicsFigure 7. Correlations of the principal modes. Correlation function Ck a?of the displacements of two atoms separated by an angle Da calculated for the principal modes of (A) 11-mer TRAP and (B) 12-mer TRAP. The vertical broken lines indicate the location of the subunit interfaces. The plots are for the principal modes of the 1st (red), 2nd (green), 3rd (blue), 4th (yellow), 5th (cyan), 6th (magenta), and 7th (black) from top to bottom. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050011.gmost to the global deformations of the ring. The variances of the 12-mer (the diagonal part of Figure 9B) are larger than those of the 11-mer (Figure 9A). 1516647 In both matrices, one can see positive or negative correlation between every fourth subunit, i, i+3, i+6, and i+9. The correlation between i and i+3 is negative, and between i and i+6 is positive. This pattern is characteristic in the T’ modes. 3 In fact, essentially the same pattern was obtained using only the lowest-frequency normal modes of T’ . This pattern is clearer for 3 the 12-mer than for the 11-mer since the number of subunits moving cooperatively (three) is commensurable with 12, but notwith 11. Movements of the entire subunit in the xy-plane showed only a small difference between the two TRAPs, and their correlation pattern was found to originate from the minor T’ 2 mode, not from the T’ (data not shown). 3 The above observations on the fluctuations were further confirmed by the decomposition of the sum of the fluctuations P SDr2 T, into the of the Ca atoms within a single subunit, ii[subunitinternal and the external (i.e., translational and rotational) contributions. The internal contribution was calculate.