Y were 30.12 (connected) and 15.17 (unrelated); for 3 m, they had been 13.05 (related)

Y were 30.12 (connected) and 15.17 (unrelated); for 3 m, they had been 13.05 (related) and 33.18 (unrelated); and for 4 m, they had been five.32 (associated) and 33.49 (unrelated). There was a statistically significant difference in the distance to the fence in the categories direct and 1 m but not inside the categories 1 m, three m, and four m (Table six).Table 6. Significances for distance for the fence between related and unrelated elephants during (re)unification.aDirect Mann hitney U Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) p Pearson’s correlation coefficient ra.1 m 6.1 m 3.3 m ten.4 m 5.3.-2.0.-1.0.-2.0.-0.0.-1.0.-0.-0.-0.-0.-0.Group variable: associated, 1; unrelated, 2.Animals 2021, 11,The percentage of time that the elephants spent at a certain distance to the fence initially encounter with the (un)related elephant/s is presented in Figure two. Elephants reuniting devote 28.31 of time in direct contact, even though elephants uniting for the initial time spend ten.23 of time in direct contact. For the category 1 m, the percentages have been 23.19 (connected elephants) and 7.93 (unrelated elephants); for 1 m, they had been 9 of 15 30.12 (related) and 15.17 (unrelated); for 3 m, they were 13.05 (associated) and 33.18 (unrelated); and for 4 m, they have been 5.32 (connected) and 33.49 (unrelated).Figure two. Percentage of time that connected and unrelated elephants stood at a specific distance for the fence throughout Figure two. Percentage of time that connected and unrelated elephants stood at a specific distance to the fence through (re)unifi(re)unification. cation.three.three. Initial Make contact with of trunks There was a statistically trunks is distinction inside the Associated elephants demonThe time until very first get in touch with ofsignificantshown in Table 7.distance towards the fence within the categories direct and 1trunks,not in the categories 1 m, 3 m, and unrelated elephants strated instant speak to of m but whilst the time until trunk get in touch with in 4 m (Table 6). ranged from 100 s to additional than 900 s. The elephants Umbu and Drumbo did not touch Table six. Significances for distance towards the fence in between associated and unrelated elephants for the duration of trunks throughout unification. As a result, a worth will not be shown for this pair.(re)unification.Table 7. Seconds until very first get in touch with of trunks duringa (re)unifications for the different pairs that had been (re)united. direct 1 m 1 m three m four mZ -2.079 -1.512 -2.079 Saly and Drumbo 107 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) p 0.038 0.131 0.038 Umbu and Drumbo not displayed Pearson’s correlation coeffi450 UnifiDMPO In Vitro cation -0.627 -0.456 936 -0.627 -0.228 cient r Zimba and Lilak Zimba Group variable: associated, 1; unrelated, 2 362 a. and KaribaBibi and Panya BPAM344 custom synthesis Reunification 3.3. Initial Speak to of Trunks and Tana Pori 2 4Mann hitney U 3.000 Setting Elephant Pair6.000 3.000 Time till Make contact with (s)10.000 Typical five.000 -0.756 -1.701 0.450 0.089 -0.The time till 1st speak to of trunks is shown in Table 7. Related elephants demonstrated immediate contact of trunks, while the time till trunk get in touch with in unrelated elephants Table 8 shows the statistical variations involving the two test groups for very first speak to ranged from 100 s Test yields 900 s. The elephants Umbu and Drumbo did not touch of trunks. The Levene’sto extra thanno statistical significance (0.165); for that reason, equal trunks for the duration of unification. Thus, a the imply shown for this speak to of trunks variances are given. The t-test shows thatvalue is nottime until very first pair.was -1023.25 s (95 -CI [-3456.35, 1409.85]) lower for the associated elephants than for the unrelated elephants. The difference amongst time till initially con.